Probably the final first name you deliberate of when you have a sneaking suspicion that of "Father's Rights" is Britney Spears. I mean, she's a mother, not a male parent. She's interested in a caging conflict with the father of her family. And she's Britney Spears, for God's sakes! But her incarceration struggle is in the news, like it or not. No, it won't set any remarkable legitimate preceding. And no, it's not the kindly of satchel that lawyers and book of judges are watching, to see new and original interpretations of law or permitted hypothesis. But if you are a parent who is caught up in a hold battle, later it's worthy observation - and LEARNING.
First, a teeny-weeny history: Britney was ab initio given care of their two children, by and large because no one could really brainwave a foundation why Kevin Federline should get detention. At that time, he had a open7 and well-documented yore of partying, of supposedly intermittently political his different child, and of not appearance appallingly curious in effort internment of his kids. The Court awarded charge to Britney, and all and sundry set low to long-life nights of Fed-ex jokes and cognitive state about what would be disclosed almost the couple's finances.